logo

Basic Siksha News.com
बेसिक शिक्षा न्यूज़ डॉट कॉम

एक छत के नीचे 'प्राइमरी का मास्टर' से जुड़ी शिक्षा विभाग की समस्त सूचनाएं एक साथ

ADD SCHOOL, ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT, CIRCULAR, GOVERNMENT ORDER, TEACHER : जूनियर एडेड विद्यालयों में जून 2008 से पूर्व बीएड योग्यता से नियुक्त शिक्षकों को अयोग्य माने जाने सम्बन्धी मा0 न्यायालय के प्रश्न पर कार्यरत प्र0अ0/शिक्षक सम्बन्धी निर्धारित बिंदुओं पर आख्या उपलब्ध कराने हेतु आदेश जारी ।

ADD SCHOOL, ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT, CIRCULAR, GOVERNMENT ORDER, TEACHER : जूनियर एडेड विद्यालयों में जून 2008 से पूर्व बीएड योग्यता से नियुक्त शिक्षकों को अयोग्य माने जाने सम्बन्धी मा0 न्यायालय के प्रश्न पर कार्यरत प्र0अ0/शिक्षक सम्बन्धी निर्धारित बिंदुओं पर आख्या उपलब्ध कराने हेतु आदेश जारी ।


Court No. - 13

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62481 of 2009

Petitioner :- Gomti Prasad Pandey & Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Khalil Ahmad Ansari,J.C. Sharma,Nisheeth Yadav,Vinod Kumar 

Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Srivastava,B.P.Singh,H.K. Srivastava,Hanuman Deen

Verma,R.P. Srivastava,Shiv Ram Dubey,Shiva Kant Dubey,U.N. Prasad,Uma Nath Pandey

Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the third respondent prays for

adjournment on the ground that he needed to file supplementary counter

affidavit as certain facts raised in the supplementary affidavit needed to

be replied to.

The controversy in the present case centres around the basic qualification

for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher and Head Master in a

Junior High School which according to the respondent, they did not

possess on the date of their appointment. It is not disputed that the

qualification of BTC has come to be amended in the year 2008 and the

B.Ed qualification candidates are also eligible w.e.f. 12th June, 2008 for the

pot of Assistant Teacher in Junior High School. The basic object of

amendment seems to be that those who were teaching in many such

schools having B.Ed qualification were in the opinion of the State had the

requisite experience of training and were successfully undertaking the

teaching work and further consider the number of vacancies and non

availability of sufficient number of BTC qualified candidates, B.Ed as such

was prescribed as also training qualification for Junior High School.

On a specific question being put to learned counsel for the respondent as

to whether the State, respondent- District Basic Education Officer and the

Higher Authorities have ever recognized such teachers appointed prior to

2008 with B.Ed. qualification and were granted salary from the State

Exchequer after bringing such Junior High Schools on grant-in-aid, no reply

in respect thereto was given for want of instruction in the matter.

The District Basic Education Officer, Basti shall file his personal affidavit in

the matter as to whether there is any such institution in district Basti that

has been accorded grant-in-aid facility and is having teachers with B.Ed.

qualification appointed prior to 2008 and are getting salary or not. State

shall also file specific affidavit of Director of Education (Basic), to explain

its position as to whether all such Junior High Schools that have been

taken on grant-in-aid are having teachers only with BTC qualification and

not B.Ed. prior to 2008. The State shall furnish details of such institution, if

any, where teachers are teaching with B.Ed. qualification in Junior High

Schools and such teachers are getting salary from the State Exchequer. 

The State shall also explain as to why those teachers, who had B.Ed

qualification at the time of their appointments and their appointments had

been approved prior to taking of the institution on grant-in-aid and have

been continued till 12th June, 2008 or therefore, be not treated as

qualified w.e.f 12th June, 2008.

List this case on 09th July, 2018.

Order Date :- 22.5.2018/Sanjeev

Post a Comment

0 Comments