ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT, PROMOTIO : प्र0अ0 उ0प्रा0वि0 पद पर पदोन्नति हेतु वरिष्ठता निर्धारण सम्बन्धी मामले में मा0 उच्च न्यायालय ने शासन से मांगा संवर्ग की संरचना पर जवाब, अगली सुनवाई 29 मई को।
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36240 of 2015
Petitioner :- Tapeshar Ram And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- K. Shahi,Indresh Chandra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Adarsh Singh,Arun Kumar,Indra Raj Singh,Saiyed Nadeem Ahmad,Shilendra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- K. Shahi,Indresh Chandra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Adarsh Singh,Arun Kumar,Indra Raj Singh,Saiyed Nadeem Ahmad,Shilendra
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
This matter has been heard alongwith connected matters. Various issues of fact and law arise for determination.
Before proceeding further, it would be necessary to permit learned counsel appearing for the Secretary, Basic Education Board to clarify as to what is the composition of cadre defined in Rule 4 of the Rules of 1981. It would also be disclosed as to whether promotions in the past have been granted by following rule 3(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 or promotions for other category of teachers have also been granted. It would also be clarified as to whether the petitioners, who are aggrieved by the seniority list as well as consequential promotion were granted promotion under rule 3(7) of the Act of 1994.
As jointly prayed, list on 29.5.2019 at top of the list.
Order Date :- 22.5.2019
Ashok Kr.
This matter has been heard alongwith connected matters. Various issues of fact and law arise for determination.
Before proceeding further, it would be necessary to permit learned counsel appearing for the Secretary, Basic Education Board to clarify as to what is the composition of cadre defined in Rule 4 of the Rules of 1981. It would also be disclosed as to whether promotions in the past have been granted by following rule 3(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 or promotions for other category of teachers have also been granted. It would also be clarified as to whether the petitioners, who are aggrieved by the seniority list as well as consequential promotion were granted promotion under rule 3(7) of the Act of 1994.
As jointly prayed, list on 29.5.2019 at top of the list.
Order Date :- 22.5.2019
Ashok Kr.
0 Comments