logo

Basic Siksha News.com
बेसिक शिक्षा न्यूज़ डॉट कॉम

एक छत के नीचे 'प्राइमरी का मास्टर' से जुड़ी शिक्षा विभाग की समस्त सूचनाएं एक साथ

ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT, EXAMINATION SCHEME, RECRUITMENT, UPTET : टेट परीक्षा में गलत प्रश्नों पर दायर याचिका के अंतिम निस्तारण तक 68500 शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के आयोजन पर ग्रहण की संभावना क्लिक कर कोर्ट का आदेश देखें ।

ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT, EXAMINATION SCHEME, RECRUITMENT, UPTET : टेट परीक्षा में गलत प्रश्नों पर दायर याचिका के अंतिम निस्तारण तक 68500 शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के आयोजन पर ग्रहण की संभावना क्लिक कर कोर्ट का आदेश देखें ।

Court No. - 23
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 28222 of 2017
Petitioner :- Mohd. Rizwan And 103 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil
Sectt.Lko.&Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh Bhadauri
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhanshu Chauhan
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Raghvendra Kumar Singh, learned Advocate
General, assisted by Sri Hari Govind Upadhyaya, learned
Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
After hearing at some substantial length, on the request of
learned Advocate General, this petition is listed on 26th
February, 2018 to enable the State respondent to file
better counter-affidavit in conformity with the earlier orders
of this Court indicating each facts and circumstances in
detail indicating the reasons as to why the guidelines of the
State Govt. for conducting examination in question have
not been followed strictly.
For filing counter-affidavit, only a week's time is granted to
the State-respondent and copy of the said counter-affidavit
be provided to the learned counsel for the petitioners of
the leading petition by 22nd February, 2018. If copy of the
counter-affidavit is provided to the learned counsel for the
petitioners Sri Amit Kumar Singh Bhadoriya, he shall file
rejoinder-affidavit by 26th February, 2018.
While filing counter-affidavit, the State respondent shall file
the relevant documents showing as to when the Expert
Committee was constituted in the light of G.O. dated 21st
August, 2017 and who were members of that committee.
As a matter of fact, the complete report of said Committee
would be filed before the Court. Further, the counter
affidavit would clearly explain as to why the questions in
respect of 'Unseen Passages' which were to be asked in the
'Language Papers' have not been asked as per the
guidelines of the Government Order dated 24.12.2014. In
Language -I (Hindi) instead of 15 questions, 5 questions
have been asked, whereas in Language-II instead of 15
questions, only 3 questions in Sanskrit and 4 questions in
Urdu have been asked. In English, only 10 questions have
been asked instead of 15 questions. In Writ Petition
No.2293 (S/S) of 2018 this anomaly has been mentioned
vide paras-22 and 23.
It has been informed by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that despite the order being passed by this
Court that the authorities concerned shall pass specific
order indicating therein that the petitioners before this
Court would be permitted to fill up the registration forms if they are found to be eligible for that by 12.02.2018 (vide
orders dated 2.2.2018) and by 19.2.2018 (vide order dated
9.2.2018) but no such order has been passed by the
authorities concerned. It was expected that the authorities
concerned should pass necessary orders in compliance of
the orders dated 2.2.2018 and 9.2.2018. It has been
informed by the counsel for the parties that the special
appeal of the State respondent has been dismissed by the
Division Bench of this Court whereby the order of this Court
dated 2.2.2018 was challenged, therefore, the authorities
concerned must have issued some order indicating therein
that the petitioners would be given liberty to fill up the
registration forms if they are found eligible for that.
Since the learned Advocate General has sought time to file
a better counter-affidavit/supplementary counter-affidavit,
therefore, it is expected that the learned Advocate General
would suggest the competent authorities to conduct the
examinations in question only after the writ petitions are
finally disposed of.
However, the learned counsel for the petitioners have
submitted that they have already concluded their
arguments on 02.02.2018 and on 09.02.2018. For rejoinder
arguments they would not take much time if State-
respondents concludes its arguments.
The interim protection as granted earlier vide orders dated
2.2.2018 and 9.2.2018 shall be extended to the petitioners
till the final disposal of this writ petition.
Order Date :- 15.2.2018
VB/

Post a Comment

0 Comments